Over the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent large multicenter study (FAME [FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation]) found that a physiologically-guided approach was superior to the standard angiographically-guided approach for percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This review addresses selected pertinent concepts and studies supporting the integration of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory for optimal patient outcomes.
Imaging Institute and
Latest posts by Schoenhagen Paul (see all)
- Ebola Virus Disease in West Africa – The First 9 Months of the Epidemic and Forward Projections - September 27, 2014
- A Comprehensive Evaluation of Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Linking Genotype With Fibrotic Phenotype - September 19, 2014
- Computed Tomography for Planning and Postoperative Imaging of Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty: First Experience in an Animal Model - August 16, 2014