Over the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent large multicenter study (FAME [FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation]) found that a physiologically-guided approach was superior to the standard angiographically-guided approach for percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This review addresses selected pertinent concepts and studies supporting the integration of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory for optimal patient outcomes.
Imaging Institute and
Latest posts by Schoenhagen Paul (see all)
- Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve By Computed Tomographic Angiography-Guided Diagnostic Strategies vs. Usual Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The Prospective Longitudinal Trial of FFRct: Outcome and Resource Impacts Study - September 22, 2015
- Low-Dose CT Coronary Angiography With a Novel IntraCycle Motion-Correction Algorithm in Patients With High Heart Rate or Heart Rate Variability - September 15, 2015
- Clinical Features and Outcomes of Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy - September 4, 2015