Over the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent large multicenter study (FAME [FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation]) found that a physiologically-guided approach was superior to the standard angiographically-guided approach for percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This review addresses selected pertinent concepts and studies supporting the integration of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory for optimal patient outcomes.
Imaging Institute and
Latest posts by Schoenhagen Paul (see all)
- Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement In Intermediate Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis - July 16, 2016
- Software Innovations in Computed Tomography for Structural Heart Disease Interventions - May 21, 2016
- Peri-Procedural Imaging for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement - May 17, 2016