
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Major Prognostic Impact of Persistent Microvascular Obstruction as Assessed by Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/65/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/65</link>
	<description>In the field of observation, chance favors the prepared minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip M. Young, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/65/comment-page-1#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip M. Young, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=65#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Nice study with 184 patients with further data supporting the import of persistent microvascular obstruction in ischemic heart disease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice study with 184 patients with further data supporting the import of persistent microvascular obstruction in ischemic heart disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobo Kirsch, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/65/comment-page-1#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=65#comment-203</guid>
		<description>It has been shown that studies using non-specific agents (such as gadolinium) overestimate true infarct size when compared with ex-vivo staining methods. This overestimation has been reported to be between 9% and 12% in some papers.

A recent article by Mather, et al. (PMID: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19698105&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;19698105&lt;/a&gt;) shows that MO during first-pass perfusion is smaller than in the delayed imaging sequences and propose that high resolution first-pass perfusion imaging may be the most accurate method to quantify MO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been shown that studies using non-specific agents (such as gadolinium) overestimate true infarct size when compared with ex-vivo staining methods. This overestimation has been reported to be between 9% and 12% in some papers.</p>
<p>A recent article by Mather, et al. (PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19698105" rel="nofollow">19698105</a>) shows that MO during first-pass perfusion is smaller than in the delayed imaging sequences and propose that high resolution first-pass perfusion imaging may be the most accurate method to quantify MO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobo Kirsch, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/65/comment-page-1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=65#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Very well designed study in a large number of patients (184) reveals that microvascular obstruction represents a strong independent predictor of major adverse cardiac effects. 
Prior reports had already reported this area of no-reflow as a good predictor for negative LV remodeling after an AMI.
One limitation of the study, mentioned by the authors, is the lack of comparison with other exams to detect the no-reflow, such as myocardial blush grade by TIMI. However, another recent paper (PMID: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19620437&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;19620437&lt;/a&gt;) suggests the superior accuracy of MRI over MBG for the assessment of myocardial reperfusion injury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well designed study in a large number of patients (184) reveals that microvascular obstruction represents a strong independent predictor of major adverse cardiac effects.<br />
Prior reports had already reported this area of no-reflow as a good predictor for negative LV remodeling after an AMI.<br />
One limitation of the study, mentioned by the authors, is the lack of comparison with other exams to detect the no-reflow, such as myocardial blush grade by TIMI. However, another recent paper (PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19620437" rel="nofollow">19620437</a>) suggests the superior accuracy of MRI over MBG for the assessment of myocardial reperfusion injury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

