
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prognostic Value of a Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assessment Soon After a First ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/80/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/80</link>
	<description>In the field of observation, chance favors the prepared minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobo Kirsch, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/80/comment-page-1#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=80#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Well designed and very interesting study of a current topic.
I found interesting that the strong prognostic information provided by microvascular obstruction was overcome by the extent of transmural necrosis when compared as independent prognostic determinants for MACE in this group of patients. However, when compared head-to-head (table 3), patients with MVO had a threefold incidence of MACE. I think that it would be interesting to compare the incidence of MACE in patients without or with MVO when there is than 50% of mural necrosis? Would that even the results? Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well designed and very interesting study of a current topic.<br />
I found interesting that the strong prognostic information provided by microvascular obstruction was overcome by the extent of transmural necrosis when compared as independent prognostic determinants for MACE in this group of patients. However, when compared head-to-head (table 3), patients with MVO had a threefold incidence of MACE. I think that it would be interesting to compare the incidence of MACE in patients without or with MVO when there is than 50% of mural necrosis? Would that even the results? Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

