
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Prepared Minds &#187; Eric M. Dandes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/author/edandes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com</link>
	<description>In the field of observation, chance favors the prepared minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CT clinical perspective: Challenges and the Impact of Future Technology Developments</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/838</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/838#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric M. Dandes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation Dosage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Stratification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 1(1):1909-1912Vannier MWComputed tomography is not the most frequent radiologic imaging procedure, but is arguably the most important in terms of clinical impact. CT is used extensively for emergencies, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological, orthopedic and other applications -often as the first and only imaging procedure needed for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 1(1):1909-1912</p><p class="authors">Vannier MW</p></div><br/><p>Computed tomography is not the most frequent radiologic imaging procedure, but is arguably the most important in terms of clinical impact. CT is used extensively for emergencies, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological, orthopedic and other applications -often as the first and only imaging procedure needed for diagnosis. The chances are very high that a patient will have a CT scan in the emergency department, as an outpatient or as an inpatient for a multitude of indications &#8211; pain, trauma, suspected infection or malignancy, and frequently to investigate symptoms such as pain, or to answer a question raised by another abnormal test, such as an EKG abnormality or ultrasound finding. Despite the universality of CT in hospitals and clinics as well as free-standing imaging centers, the technology continues to evolve with greater coverage, faster acquisition and multienergy sources or detectors. The most demanding imaging applications are cardiovascular, where complex motion and small morphologic features coexist, so imaging methods that are very satisfactory elsewhere in the body may not be successful. Clinical CT scanning consists of administering toxic materials, e.g., contrast media, often monitoring the EKG and illuminating the body with high brightness x-rays. Larger area detectors and higher acquisition rates are welcome improvements, but don&#8217;t solve all of the problems encountered with scan variability due to respiratory, random body, and cardiac motion, especially in a spectrum of patients from infant to massively obese adult sizes (&lt; 1 kg to 250 kg or more). The challenges and pitfalls in CT will be delineated and evaluated relative to current and future technology.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19965146" target="_blank">19965146</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/838/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Reconstruction Algorithm Allows Shortened Acquisition Time for Myocardial Perfusion SPECT</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/587</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/587#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric M. Dandes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterative Reconstruction (IR) Algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation Dosage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009; 49(S1):72Valenta I, Treyer V, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Schindler MJ, Herzog BA, Veit-Heibach P, Buechel RR, Nkoulou R, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PAOBJECTIVES: : Shortening scan time and/or reducing radiation dose at maintained image quality are the main issues of the current research in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009; 49(S1):72</p><p class="authors">Valenta I, Treyer V, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Schindler MJ, Herzog BA, Veit-Heibach P, Buechel RR, Nkoulou R, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PA</p></div><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: : Shortening scan time and/or reducing radiation dose at maintained image quality are the main issues of the current research in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). We aimed to validate a new iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm for SPECT MPI allowing shortened acquisition time (HALF time) while maintaining image quality vs. standard full time acquisition (FULL time).</p>
<p>METHODS: In this study, 50 patients, referred for evaluation of known or suspected coronary artery disease by SPECT MPI using 99mTc-Tetrofosmin, underwent 1-day adenosine stress 300 MBq/rest 900 MBq protocol with standard (stress 15 min/rest 15 min FULL time) immediately followed by short emission scan (stress 9 min/rest 7 min HALF time) on a Ventri SPECT camera (GE Healthcare). FULL time scans were processed with IR, short scans were additionally processed with a recently developed software algorithm for HALF time emission scans. All reconstructions were subsequently analyzed using commercially available software (QPS/QGS, Cedars Medical Sinai) with/without X-ray based attenuation correction (AC). Uptake values (percent of maximum) were compared by regression and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis in a 20-segment model.</p>
<p>RESULTS: HALF scans yielded a 96% readout and 100% clinical diagnosis concordance compared to FULL. Correlation for uptake in each segment (n = 1,000) was r = 0.87at stress (p &lt; 0.001) and r = 0.89 at rest (p &lt; 0.001) with respective BA limits of agreement of -11% to 10% and -12% to 11%. After AC similar correlation (r = 0.82, rest; r = 0.80, stress, both p &lt; 0.001) and BA limits were found (-12% to 10%; -13% to 12%).</p>
<p>CONCLUSION: With the new IR algorithm, SPECT MPI can be acquired at half of the scan time without compromising image quality, resulting in an excellent agreement with FULL time scans regarding to uptake and clinical conclusion.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19921186" target="_blank">19921186</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/587/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

