<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Prepared Minds &#187; Journal Club Selections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/category/journal-club/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com</link>
	<description>In the field of observation, chance favors the prepared minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Identifying Substrate for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4205</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4205#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Infarction (MI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (SMVT)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5(1):12-20White JA, Fine NM, Gula L, Yee R, Skanes A, Klein G, Leong-Sit P, Warren H, Thompson T, Drangova M, Krahn AOBJECTIVES: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) are frequently associated with prior or acute myocardial injury. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides morphological, functional, and tissue characterization [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5(1):12-20</p><p class="authors">White JA, Fine NM, Gula L, Yee R, Skanes A, Klein G, Leong-Sit P, Warren H, Thompson T, Drangova M, Krahn A</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) are frequently associated with prior or acute myocardial injury. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides morphological, functional, and tissue characterization in a single setting. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic yield of CMR-based imaging versus non-CMR-based imaging in patients with resuscitated SCD or SMVT.</p>
<p>METHODS: Eighty-two patients with resuscitated SCD or SMVT underwent routine non-CMR imaging, followed by a CMR protocol with comprehensive tissue characterization. Clinical reports of non-CMR imaging studies were blindly adjudicated and used to assign each patient to 1 of 7 diagnostic categories. CMR imaging was blindly interpreted using a standardized algorithm used to assign a patient diagnosis category in a similar fashion. The diagnostic yield of CMR-based and non-CMR-based imaging, as well as the impact of the former on diagnosis reclassification, was established.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Relevant myocardial disease was identified in 51% of patients using non-CMR-based imaging and in 74% using CMR-based imaging (P=0.002). Forty-one patients (50%) were reassigned to a new or alternate diagnosis using CMR-based imaging, including 15 (18%) with unsuspected acute myocardial injury. Twenty patients (24%) had no abnormality by non-CMR imaging but showed clinically relevant myocardial disease by CMR imaging.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: CMR-based imaging provides a robust diagnostic yield in patients presenting with resuscitated SCD or SMVT and incrementally identifies clinically unsuspected acute myocardial injury. When compared with non-CMR-based imaging, a new or alternate myocardial disease process may be identified in half of these patients.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22038987" target="_blank">22038987</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4205/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC): A Prospective Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4077</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4077#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 07:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Invasive Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE-MARC Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Ischaemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspected CAD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>The Lancet. 2011; 378(9809):2089-2094John P Greenwood, Neil Maredia, John F Younger, Julia M Brown, Jane Nixon, Colin C Everett, Petra Bijsterveld, John P Ridgway, Aleksandra Radjenovic, Catherine J Dickinson, Stephen G Ball, Sven Plein OBJECTIVES: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">The Lancet. 2011; 378(9809):2089-2094</p><p class="authors">John P Greenwood, Neil Maredia, John F Younger, Julia M Brown, Jane Nixon, Colin C Everett, Petra Bijsterveld, John P Ridgway, Aleksandra Radjenovic, Catherine J Dickinson, Stephen G Ball, Sven Plein</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><div>
<p>OBJECTIVES: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol with x-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard, and to compare CMR with SPECT, in patients with suspected coronary heart disease.</p>
<p>METHODS: In this prospective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were scheduled for CMR, SPECT, and invasive x-ray coronary angiography. CMR consisted of rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress and rest SPECT used 99mTc tetrofosmin. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of CMR.</p>
<p>RESULTS: In the 752 recruited patients, 39% had significant CHD as identified by x-ray angiography. For multiparametric CMR the sensitivity was 86·5% (95% CI 81·8—90·1), specificity 83·4% (79·5—86·7), positive predictive value 77·2%, (72·1—81·6) and negative predictive value 90·5% (87·1—93·0). The sensitivity of SPECT was 66·5% (95% CI 60·4—72·1), specificity 82·6% (78·5—86·1), positive predictive value 71·4% (65·3—76·9), and negative predictive value 79·1% (74·8—82·8). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMR and SPECT differed significantly (p&lt;0·0001 for both) but specificity and positive predictive value did not (p=0·916 and p=0·061, respectively).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: CE-MARC is the largest, prospective, real world evaluation of CMR and has established CMR&#8217;s high diagnostic accuracy in coronary heart disease and CMR&#8217;s superiority over SPECT. It should be adopted more widely than at present for the investigation of coronary heart disease.</p>
</div>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/" target="_blank"></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4077/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Timing of Cardiovascular MR Imaging After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Effect on Estimates of Infarct Characteristics and Prediction of Late Ventricular Remodeling</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3897</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3897#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 03:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left Ventrical Ejection Fraction (LVEF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T2-Weighted Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=3897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>Radiology. 2011; 261(1):116-126Mather AN, Fairbairn TA, Artis NJ, Greenwood JP, Plein SOBJECTIVES: To define the evolution of infarct characteristics with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to assess which of the cardiovascular MR data acquired at day 2 or at 1 week after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), is the stronger predictor of infarct size and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Radiology. 2011; 261(1):116-126</p><p class="authors">Mather AN, Fairbairn TA, Artis NJ, Greenwood JP, Plein S</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: To define the evolution of infarct characteristics with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to assess which of the cardiovascular MR data acquired at day 2 or at 1 week after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), is the stronger predictor of infarct size and left ventricular (LV) function measured at 3 months.</p>
<p>METHODS: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the local research ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained. Forty-eight patients with reperfused AMI underwent cine, T2-weighted, and late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular MR imaging at days 2, 7, 30, and 90 after index presentation. Continuous data between times were compared by using paired t tests or one-way analysis of variance. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to predict linear end points.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Infarct size and extent of myocardial edema decreased significantly between day 2 and 1 week: Mean scar as a percentage of LV mass and standard deviation (SD), respectively, were 27.2 and 13.9 versus 21.6 and 14.1 (P &lt; .001), and myocardial edema as a percentage of LV mass and SD, respectively, were 37.9 and 15.2 versus 32.3 and 14.3 (P = .003). These changes were accompanied by a significant improvement in LV ejection fraction (LVEF): Mean percentage of LVEF and SD, respectively, were 41.7 and 9.6 versus 44.6 and 10.1 (P &lt; .001). When comparing data acquired at day 2 and 1 week, only cardiovascular MR data acquired at 1 week were independent predictors of LVEF and infarct size at 3 months.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: LVEF, infarct size, and extent of myocardial edema changed significantly during the 1st week after AMI. Overall, cardiovascular MR measurements acquired after 1 week have greater predictive value for infarct size and LV function at 3 months than data acquired at day 2.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21828188" target="_blank">21828188</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3897/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3798</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3798#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acute Chest Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost-Effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Department (ED)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Stratification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=3798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(14):1414-1422Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Hoffmann U, Lesser JR, Mikati IA, O'Neil BJ, Shaw LJ, Shen MY, Valeti US, Raff GL; CT-STAT InvestigatorsOBJECTIVES:  In the United States, &#62;8 million patients require emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain annually at an estimated diagnostic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(14):1414-1422</p><p class="authors">Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Hoffmann U, Lesser JR, Mikati IA, O'Neil BJ, Shaw LJ, Shen MY, Valeti US, Raff GL; CT-STAT Investigators</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES:  In the United States, &gt;8 million patients require emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain annually at an estimated diagnostic cost of &gt;$10 billion. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency, cost, and safety of a diagnostic strategy employing early coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) to a strategy employing rest-stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the evaluation of acute low-risk chest pain.</p>
<p>METHODS: This multicenter, randomized clinical trial in 16 emergency departments ran between June 2007 and November 2008. Patients were randomly allocated to CCTA (n = 361) or MPI (n = 338) as the index noninvasive test. The primary outcome was time to diagnosis; the secondary outcomes were emergency department costs of care and safety, defined as freedom from major adverse cardiac events in patients with normal index tests, including 6-month follow-up.</p>
<p>RESULTS: The CCTA resulted in a 54% reduction in time to diagnosis compared with MPI (median 2.9 h [25th to 75th percentile: 2.1 to 4.0 h] vs. 6.3 h [25th to 75th percentile: 4.2 to 19.0 h], p &lt; 0.0001). Costs of care were 38% lower compared with standard (median $2,137 [25th to 75th percentile: $1,660 to $3,077] vs. $3,458 [25th to 75th percentile: $2,900 to $4,297], p &lt; 0.0001). The diagnostic strategies had no difference in major adverse cardiac events after normal index testing (0.8% in the CCTA arm vs. 0.4% in the MPI arm, p = 0.29).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: In emergency department acute, low-risk chest pain patients, the use of CCTA results in more rapid and cost-efficient safe diagnosis than rest-stress MPI. Further studies comparing CCTA to other diagnostic strategies are needed to optimize evaluation of specific patient subsets.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21939822" target="_blank">21939822</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3798/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation and Infarct Size in Patients With Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction Without Shock: The CRISP AMI Randomized Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3728</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3728#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Invasive Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiogenic Shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CPCI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISP AMI Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation (IABC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left Ventrical Ejection Fraction (LVEF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Infarction (MI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reperfusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=3728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>JAMA. 2011; 306(8):839-847Patel MR, Smalling RW, Thiele H, Barnhart HX, Zhou Y, Chandra P, Chew D, Cohen M, French J, Perera D, Ohman EMOBJECTIVES: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) is an adjunct to revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock and reduces infarct size when placed prior to reperfusion in animal models.To determine if routine IABC placement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">JAMA. 2011; 306(8):839-847</p><p class="authors">Patel MR, Smalling RW, Thiele H, Barnhart HX, Zhou Y, Chandra P, Chew D, Cohen M, French J, Perera D, Ohman EM</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) is an adjunct to revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock and reduces infarct size when placed prior to reperfusion in animal models.To determine if routine IABC placement prior to reperfusion in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without shock reduces myocardial infarct size.</p>
<p>METHODS: An open, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, the Counterpulsation to Reduce Infarct Size Pre-PCI Acute Myocardial Infarction (CRISP AMI) included 337 patients with acute anterior STEMI but without cardiogenic shock at 30 sites in 9 countries from June 2009 through February 2011.Intervention Initiation of IABC before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and continuation for at least 12 hours (IABC plus PCI) vs primary PCI alone.Main Outcome Measures Infarct size expressed as a percentage of left ventricular (LV) mass and measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed 3 to 5 days after PCI. Secondary end points included all-cause death at 6 months and vascular complications and major bleeding at 30 days. Multiple imputations were performed for missing infarct size data.</p>
<p>RESULTS: The median time from first contact to first coronary device was 77 minutes (interquartile range, 53 to 114 minutes) for the IABC plus PCI group vs 68 minutes (interquartile range, 40 to 100 minutes) for the PCI alone group (P = .04). The mean infarct size was not significantly different between the patients in the IABC plus PCI group and in the PCI alone group (42.1% [95% CI, 38.7% to 45.6%] vs 37.5% [95% CI, 34.3% to 40.8%], respectively; difference of 4.6% [95% CI, -0.2% to 9.4%], P = .06; imputed difference of 4.5% [95% CI, -0.3% to 9.3%], P = .07) and in patients with proximal left anterior descending Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow scores of 0 or 1 (46.7% [95% CI, 42.8% to 50.6%] vs 42.3% [95% CI, 38.6% to 45.9%], respectively; difference of 4.4% [95% CI, -1.0% to 9.7%], P = .11; imputed difference of 4.8% [95% CI, -0.6% to 10.1%], P = .08). At 30 days, there were no significant differences between the IABC plus PCI group and the PCI alone group for major vascular complications (n = 7 [4.3%; 95% CI, 1.8% to 8.8%] vs n = 2 [1.1%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 4.0%], respectively; P = .09) and major bleeding or transfusions (n = 5 [3.1%; 95% CI, 1.0% to 7.1%] vs n = 3 [1.7%; 95% CI, 0.4% to 4.9%]; P = .49). By 6 months, 3 patients (1.9%; 95% CI, 0.6% to 5.7%) in the IABC plus PCI group and 9 patients (5.2%; 95% CI, 2.7% to 9.7%) in the PCI alone group had died (P = .12).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute anterior STEMI without shock, IABC plus primary PCI compared with PCI alone did not result in reduced infarct size.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21878431" target="_blank">21878431</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3728/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis &#8211; Myocardial Fibrosis and its Influence on Function and Outcome</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3590</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3590#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Echo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aortic Stenosis (AS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left Ventrical Ejection Fraction (LVEF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitral Ring Displacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Fibrosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=3590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(4):402-412Herrmann S, Störk S, Niemann M, Lange V, Strotmann JM, Frantz S, Beer M, Gattenlöhner S, Voelker W, Ertl G, Weidemann FOBJECTIVES: This prospective cohort study in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) aimed to identify surrogates of myocardial fibrosis that are easy to derive in clinical practice, allow the differentiation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(4):402-412</p><p class="authors">Herrmann S, Störk S, Niemann M, Lange V, Strotmann JM, Frantz S, Beer M, Gattenlöhner S, Voelker W, Ertl G, Weidemann F</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: This prospective cohort study in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) aimed to identify surrogates of myocardial fibrosis that are easy to derive in clinical practice, allow the differentiation of low-gradient severe AS from moderate AS, and have an impact on clinical outcome. In patients with symptomatic aortic AS, a characteristic subgroup (i.e., up to one-third) exhibits severe AS with a concomitant low mean valve gradient either with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (EF). It is hypothesized that these patients tend to have an advanced stage of myocardial fibrosis and poor clinical outcome.</p>
<p>METHODS: Eighty-six patients with moderate or severe AS were examined by echocardiography including conventional aortic valve assessment, mitral ring displacement, and strain-rate imaging. Replacement fibrosis was quantified by late-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Biopsy samples were taken from patients with severe AS (n = 69) at aortic valve replacement. All patients were followed for 9 months.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Patients were divided into 4 groups according to aortic valve area (&lt;1.0 cm(2)), mean valve gradient ≥40 mm Hg, and EF (&lt;50%): group 1, moderate AS (n = 17); group 2, severe AS/high gradient (n = 49); group 3, severe AS/low gradient/preserved EF (n = 11); and group 4, severe AS/low gradient/decreased EF (n = 9). At baseline, a significant decrease in mitral ring displacement and systolic strain rate was detected in patients with low-gradient AS. In low-gradient groups, a higher degree of interstitial fibrosis in biopsy samples and more late-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging segments were observed. A close inverse correlation was found between interstitial fibrosis and mitral ring displacement (r = -0.79, p &lt; 0.0001). Clinical outcome was best for patients in group 1, whereas mortality risk increased substantially in groups 2 through 4.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS, a low gradient is associated with a higher degree of fibrosis, decreased longitudinal function, and poorer clinical outcome despite preserved EF. Mitral ring displacement differentiates between moderate AS and low-gradient/severe AS with preserved EF.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21757118" target="_blank">21757118</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3590/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Enlargement After Endovascular Repair</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3451</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3451#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Factors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=3451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>Circulation. 2011; 123(24):431-442Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, Robinson WP, Eslami MH, Goldberg RJ, Messina LOBJECTIVES: The majority of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs in the United States are performed with endovascular methods. Baseline aortoiliac arterial anatomic characteristics are fundamental criteria for appropriate patient selection for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and key determinants of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Circulation. 2011; 123(24):431-442</p><p class="authors">Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, Robinson WP, Eslami MH, Goldberg RJ, Messina L</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: The majority of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs in the United States are performed with endovascular methods. Baseline aortoiliac arterial anatomic characteristics are fundamental criteria for appropriate patient selection for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and key determinants of long-term success. We evaluated compliance with anatomic guidelines for EVAR and the relationship between baseline aortoiliac arterial anatomy and post-EVAR AAA sac enlargement.</p>
<p>METHODS: Patients with pre-EVAR and at least 1 post-EVAR computed tomography scan were identified from the M2S, Inc. imaging database (1999 to 2008). Preoperative baseline aortoiliac anatomic characteristics were reviewed for each patient. Data relating to the specific AAA endovascular device implanted were not available. Therefore, morphological measurements were compared with the most liberal and the most conservative published anatomic guidelines as stated in each manufacturer&#8217;s instructions for use.</p>
<p>RESULTS: The primary study outcome was post-EVAR AAA sac enlargement (&gt;5-mm diameter increase). In 10 228 patients undergoing EVAR, 59% had a maximum AAA diameter below the 55-mm threshold at which intervention is recommended over surveillance. Only 42% of patients had anatomy that met the most conservative definition of device instructions for use; 69% met the most liberal definition of device instructions for use. The 5-year post-EVAR rate of AAA sac enlargement was 41%. Independent predictors of AAA sac enlargement included endoleak, age ≥80 years, aortic neck diameter ≥28 mm, aortic neck angle &gt;60°, and common iliac artery diameter &gt;20 mm.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter observational study, compliance with EVAR device guidelines was low and post-EVAR aneurysm sac enlargement was high, raising concern for long-term risk of aneurysm rupture.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21478500 " target="_blank">21478500 </a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3451/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prognostic Value of CT Angiography for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Acute Chest Pain From the Emergency Department 2-Year Outcomes of the ROMICAT Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3370</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3370#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acute Chest Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Event (MACE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Department (ED)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prognosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities (RWMA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspected CAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triage Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=3370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4(5):481-491Schlett CL, Banerji D, Siegel E, Bamberg F, Lehman SJ, Ferencik M, Brady TJ, Nagurney JT, Hoffmann U, Truong QAOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the 2-year prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography (CT) for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients presenting to the emergency department [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4(5):481-491</p><p class="authors">Schlett CL, Banerji D, Siegel E, Bamberg F, Lehman SJ, Ferencik M, Brady TJ, Nagurney JT, Hoffmann U, Truong QA</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the 2-year prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography (CT) for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain. CT has high potential for early triage of acute chest pain patients. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the prognostic value of CT in this ED cohort.</p>
<p>METHODS: We followed 368 patients from the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial (age 53 ± 12 years; 61% male) who presented to the ED with acute chest pain, negative initial troponin, and a nonischemic electrocardiogram for 2 years. Contrast-enhanced 64-slice CT was obtained during index hospitalization, and caregivers and patients remained blinded to the results. CT was assessed for the presence of plaque, stenosis (&gt;50% luminal narrowing), and left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA). The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as composite cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Follow-up was completed in 333 patients (90.5%) with a median follow-up period of 23 months. At the end of the follow-up period, 25 patients (6.8%) experienced 35 MACE (no cardiac deaths, 12 myocardial infarctions, and 23 revascularizations). Cumulative probability of 2-year MACE increased across CT strata for coronary artery disease (CAD) (no CAD 0%; nonobstructive CAD 4.6%; obstructive CAD 30.3%; log-rank p &lt; 0.0001) and across combined CT strata for CAD and RWMA (no stenosis or RWMA 0.9%; 1 feature-either RWMA [15.0%] or stenosis [10.1%], both stenosis and RWMA 62.4%; log-rank p &lt; 0.0001). The c statistic for predicting MACE was 0.61 for clinical Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score and improved to 0.84 by adding CT CAD data and improved further to 0.91 by adding RWMA (both p &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: CT coronary and functional features predict MACE and have incremental prognostic value beyond clinical risk score in ED patients with acute chest pain. The absence of CAD on CT provides a 2-year MACE-free warranty period, whereas coronary stenosis with RWMA is associated with the highest risk of MACE.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21565735" target="_blank">21565735</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3370/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Differences in Corrected Coronary Opacification Measured With Computed Tomography Predict Resting Coronary Artery Flow?</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3221</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3221#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 22:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corrected Coronary Opacification (CCO)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=3221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57(11):1280-1288Chow BJ, Kass M, Gagné O, Chen L, Yam Y, Dick A, Wells GAOBJECTIVES: A proof-of-concept study was undertaken to determine whether differences in corrected coronary opacification (CCO) within coronary lumen can identify arteries with abnormal resting coronary flow. Although computed tomographic coronary angiography can be used for the detection of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57(11):1280-1288</p><p class="authors">Chow BJ, Kass M, Gagné O, Chen L, Yam Y, Dick A, Wells GA</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: A proof-of-concept study was undertaken to determine whether differences in corrected coronary opacification (CCO) within coronary lumen can identify arteries with abnormal resting coronary flow. Although computed tomographic coronary angiography can be used for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease, it cannot reliably differentiate between anatomical and functional stenoses.</p>
<p>METHODS: Computed tomographic coronary angiography patients (without history of revascularization, cardiac transplantation, and congenital heart disease) who underwent invasive coronary angiography were enrolled. Attenuation values of coronary lumen were measured before and after stenoses and normalized to the aorta. Changes in CCO were calculated, and CCO differences were compared with severity of coronary stenosis and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow at the time of invasive coronary angiography.</p>
<p>RESULTS: One hundred four coronary arteries (n = 52, mean age = 60.0 ± 9.5 years; men = 71.2%) were assessed. Compared with normal arteries, the CCO differences were greater in arteries with computed tomographic coronary angiography diameter stenoses ≥50%. Similarly, CCO differences were greater in arteries with TIMI flow grade &lt;3 (0.406 ± 0.226) compared with those with normal flow (TIMI flow grade 3) (0.078 ± 0.078, p &lt; 0.001). With CCO differences, abnormal coronary flow (TIMI flow grade &lt;3) was identified with a sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.7 to 95.6%), 91.2% (95% CI: 75.2% to 97.7%), 83.3% (95% CI: 57.7% to 95.6%), and 91.2% (95% CI: 75.2% to 97.7%), respectively. Accuracy of this method was 88.5% with very good agreement (kappa = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.94).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Changes in CCO across coronary stenoses seem to predict abnormal (TIMI flow grade &lt;3) resting coronary blood flow. Further studies are needed to understand its incremental diagnostic value and its potential to measure stress coronary blood flow.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21392642" target="_blank">21392642</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3221/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prognostic Value of Cardiac Hybrid Imaging Integrating Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3067</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3067#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Araoz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Event (MACE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prognosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Stratification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspected CAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tc-99m SPECT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=3067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>European Heart Journal . 2011; 32(5):1103-1107Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Ghadri JR, Herzog BA, Buechel RR, Küest SM, Wolfrum M, Fiechter M, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PAOBJECTIVES:  Although cardiac hybrid imaging, fusing single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), provides important complementary diagnostic information for coronary artery disease [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">European Heart Journal . 2011; 32(5):1103-1107</p><p class="authors">Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Ghadri JR, Herzog BA, Buechel RR, Küest SM, Wolfrum M, Fiechter M, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PA</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES:  Although cardiac hybrid imaging, fusing single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), provides important complementary diagnostic information for coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment, no prognostic data exist on the predictive value of cardiac hybrid imaging. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of hybrid SPECT/CCTA images.</p>
<div>
<p>METHODS:  Of 335 consecutive patients undergoing a 1-day stress/rest <sup>99m</sup>Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT and a CCTA, acquired on stand-alone scanners and fused to obtain cardiac hybrid images, follow-up was obtained in 324 patients (97%). Survival free of all-cause death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and free of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, MI, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, coronary revascularizations) was determined using the Kaplan–Meier method for the following groups: (i) stenosis by CCTA and matching reversible SPECT defect; (ii) unmatched CCTA and SPECT finding; and (iii) normal finding by CCTA and SPECT. Cox&#8217;s proportional hazard regression was used to identify independent predictors for cardiac events.</p>
<p>RESULTS:  At a median follow-up of 2.8 years (25th–75th percentile: 1.9–3.6), 69 MACE occurred in 47 patients, including 20 death/MI. A corresponding matched hybrid image finding was associated with a significantly higher death/MI incidence (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.005) and proved to be an independent predictor for MACE. The annual death/MI rate was 6.0, 2.8, and 1.3% for patients with matched, unmatched, and normal findings.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>CONCLUSIONS:  Cardiac hybrid imaging allows risk stratification in patients with known or suspected CAD. A matched defect on hybrid image is a strong predictor of MACE.</p>
</div>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21320906 " target="_blank">21320906 </a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/3067/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

