<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Prepared Minds &#187; Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/category/magnetic-resonance-imaging/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com</link>
	<description>In the field of observation, chance favors the prepared minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transarterial Aortic Valve Implantation In-Vivo Evaluation in Swine</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4235</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4235#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Invasive Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Study (Pigs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medtronic-Corevalve Bioprosthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rtMRI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(2):192-193Kahlert P, Parohl N, Albert J, Schäfer L, Reinhardt R, Kaiser GM, McDougall I, Decker B, Plicht B, Erbel R, Eggebrecht H, Ladd ME, Quick HHReal-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) is considered attractive for guiding transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Compared with X-ray fluoroscopy, rtMRI offers unrestricted scan plane orientation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(2):192-193</p><p class="authors">Kahlert P, Parohl N, Albert J, Schäfer L, Reinhardt R, Kaiser GM, McDougall I, Decker B, Plicht B, Erbel R, Eggebrecht H, Ladd ME, Quick HH</p></div><br/><p>Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) is considered attractive for guiding transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Compared with X-ray fluoroscopy, rtMRI offers unrestricted scan plane orientation and an unsurpassed soft-tissue contrast with simultaneous device visualization, potentially allowing enhanced positioning accuracy together with online monitoring of cardiac function and immediate detection of complications. Additionally, MRI offers noninvasive assessment of cardiovascular anatomy and function for preinterventional screening as well as immediate morphologic and functional assessment of the implanted prothesis and may, thus, be envisioned as a single comprehensive imaging modality for TAVI. We, therefore, sought to assess the preclinical feasibility of entirely rtMRI-guided TAVI in a swine model (female domestic pigs weighing 70.5 to 86.5 kg) using the original CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis without alterations in conjunction with a modified, MRI-compatible delivery device (1).</p>
<p>rtMRI-guided transfemoral (n = 2) and transsubclavian (n = 6) TAVI was performed in a 1.5-T whole-body MRI scanner (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens Healthcare Sector, Erlangen, Germany). Conventional x-ray fluoroscopy and angiography were performed for comparison. After pre-interventional evaluation using standard steady-state free-precession imaging with electrocardiographic gating and time-resolved retrospective image reconstruction (cine-TrueFISP retro) (TR, 40 ms; TE, 1.1 ms; flip angle, 62°; FOV, 380 x 330 mm2; matrix, 192 x 168; slice thickness, 6 mm; bandwidth, 930 Hz/pixel; image acquisition time, 15 s for a single slice acquired over 20 phases of the cardiac R-R interval) and electrocardiography-triggered, flow-sensitive, phase-contrast sequences (TR, 62 ms; TE, 3.5 ms; flip angle, 30°; FOV, 320 x 220 mm2; matrix, 192 x 132; bandwidth, 555 Hz/pixel; acquisition time, 1 min 52 s; velocity encoding value, 100 cm/s), TAVI was performed using rtMRI fluoroscopy based on a commercially available interactive real-time projection reconstruction TrueFISP sequence with radial k-space filling during free breathing and without cardiac triggering that was modified to achieve a frame rate of 7 frames per second (TR, 3.0 ms; TE, 1.5 ms; flip angle, 70°; FOV, 360 x 360 mm2; matrix, 192 x 192; bandwidth, 1530 Hz/pixel; slice thickness, 6 mm). Images were displayed without delay inside the scanner room and could be adapted interactively according to the operator&#8217;s (P.K.) needs while the sequence was running. After TAVI, real-time TrueFISP, cine-TrueFISP retro, and flow-sensitive phase-contrast sequences were used to verify procedural success. Autopsies were performed to validate MRI findings.</p>
<p>Three-point localizer sequences allowed for rapid detection (11 ± 3 min) of all scan planes required for preinterventional evaluation, procedural guidance, and post-procedural validation. High-resolution TrueFISP retro sequences enabled detailed visualization of all procedurally relevant anatomic landmarks and allowed precise measurements (aortic annulus diameter in long axis, 17 ± 3 mm; aortic arch diameter, 21 ± 4 mm; distance from aortic annulus to left and right coronary ostium, 9 ± 3 and 10 ± 2 mm; access vessel diameter, 6.9 ± 1.2 mm) in good accordance with measurements on previous angiographic images (mean error, 0.4 ± 0.3 mm; p = NS) and during autopsy (mean error, 0.5 ± 0.2 mm; p = NS).</p>
<p>Passive device visualization using real-time TrueFISP sequences provided reliable imaging guidance during TAVI superior to fluoroscopy. Mild susceptibility artifacts confined to the loaded stent valve enabled adequate determination of the position of stent valve and delivery system in relation to the surrounding anatomy without undue image distortion, allowing a precise, real-time anatomic orientation during device navigation through the vasculature, aortic valve passage, positioning and deployment of the prosthesis, and catheter withdrawal.</p>
<p>In 6 of 8 animals, an oversized 26-mm CoreValve prosthesis was successfully placed across the aortic annulus without dislocation, coronary artery obstruction, or impairment of the mitral valve, as confirmed by autopsy (rtMRI acquisition time, 4 ± 2 min) (Fig. 1). However, 2 implant failures occurred. The first was a result of unsuccessful aortic arch passage due to insufficient support by the initially used MRI-compatible, soft polymer guidewire and led to a controlled deployment of the stent valve in the thoracic aorta, which is sometimes required in clinical application when the prosthesis dislocates into the ascending aorta during deployment. As a consequence, we continued our experiments without guidewire support and focused on the straighter transsubclavian access route. The second implant failure occurred due to perforation of the left ventricular apex caused by the delivery device, which was inadvertently pushed with too much force, this complication being immediately detected by rtMRI. Both cases indicate that rtMRI might improve both precision and safety of the TAVI procedure.</p>
<p>Postprocedural TrueFISP retro sequences allowed precise structural evaluation of the procedural result in good accordance with autopsy findings. Flow-sensitive, electrocardiography-triggered, phase-contrast sequences with imaging planes placed approximately 1 cm below and above the nitinol stent frame confirmed good systolic transvalvular blood flow without diastolic regurgitation. The current study demonstrates the preclinical feasibility of entirely MRI-guided TAVI. As a single imaging modality, MRI offered comprehensive diagnostic evaluation of the relevant cardiac and vascular anatomy for adequate interventional planning, real-time procedural guidance with excellent anatomic orientation, immediate evaluation of procedure-related complications, and post-interventional validation of treatment success with a total procedure time of 61 ± 13 min. Complementary to reduction of radiation exposure and nephrotoxic contrast media, rtMRI guidance, therefore, provides clinically relevant advantages over conventional X-ray-fluoroscopy and warrants further attention. These advantages should encourage future efforts to translate rtMRI-guided TAVI into clinical application using commercial but modified or entirely novel devices (2,3) and to overcome remaining obstacles such as the development of suitable, MRI-compatible guidewires.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22222083" target="_blank">22222083</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4235/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Identifying Substrate for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4205</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4205#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Infarction (MI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (SMVT)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5(1):12-20White JA, Fine NM, Gula L, Yee R, Skanes A, Klein G, Leong-Sit P, Warren H, Thompson T, Drangova M, Krahn AOBJECTIVES: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) are frequently associated with prior or acute myocardial injury. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides morphological, functional, and tissue characterization [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5(1):12-20</p><p class="authors">White JA, Fine NM, Gula L, Yee R, Skanes A, Klein G, Leong-Sit P, Warren H, Thompson T, Drangova M, Krahn A</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) are frequently associated with prior or acute myocardial injury. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides morphological, functional, and tissue characterization in a single setting. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic yield of CMR-based imaging versus non-CMR-based imaging in patients with resuscitated SCD or SMVT.</p>
<p>METHODS: Eighty-two patients with resuscitated SCD or SMVT underwent routine non-CMR imaging, followed by a CMR protocol with comprehensive tissue characterization. Clinical reports of non-CMR imaging studies were blindly adjudicated and used to assign each patient to 1 of 7 diagnostic categories. CMR imaging was blindly interpreted using a standardized algorithm used to assign a patient diagnosis category in a similar fashion. The diagnostic yield of CMR-based and non-CMR-based imaging, as well as the impact of the former on diagnosis reclassification, was established.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Relevant myocardial disease was identified in 51% of patients using non-CMR-based imaging and in 74% using CMR-based imaging (P=0.002). Forty-one patients (50%) were reassigned to a new or alternate diagnosis using CMR-based imaging, including 15 (18%) with unsuspected acute myocardial injury. Twenty patients (24%) had no abnormality by non-CMR imaging but showed clinically relevant myocardial disease by CMR imaging.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: CMR-based imaging provides a robust diagnostic yield in patients presenting with resuscitated SCD or SMVT and incrementally identifies clinically unsuspected acute myocardial injury. When compared with non-CMR-based imaging, a new or alternate myocardial disease process may be identified in half of these patients.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22038987" target="_blank">22038987</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4205/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patient Management After Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging &#8211; Results From SPARC (Study of Myocardial Perfusion and Coronary Anatomy Imaging Roles in Coronary Artery Disease)</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4195</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4195#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Echo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CPCI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medication Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noninvasive Coronary Angiography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(5):462-474 Rory Hachamovitch, Benjamin Nutter, Mark A. Hlatky, Leslee J. Shaw, Michael L. Ridner, Sharmila Dorbala, Rob S.B. Beanlands, Benjamin J.W. Chow, Elizabeth Branscomb, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, W. Guy Weigold, Szilard Voros, Suhny Abbara, Tsunehiro Yasuda, Jill E. Jacobs, John Lesser, Daniel S. Berman, Louise E.J. Thomson, Subha Raman, Gary V. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(5):462-474 </p><p class="authors">Rory Hachamovitch, Benjamin Nutter, Mark A. Hlatky, Leslee J. Shaw, Michael L. Ridner, Sharmila Dorbala, Rob S.B. Beanlands, Benjamin J.W. Chow, Elizabeth Branscomb, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, W. Guy Weigold, Szilard Voros, Suhny Abbara, Tsunehiro Yasuda, Jill E. Jacobs, John Lesser, Daniel S. Berman, Louise E.J. Thomson, Subha Raman, Gary V. Heller, Adam Schussheim, Richard Brunken, Kim A. Williams, Susan Farkas, Dominique Delbeke, Uwe J. Schoepf, Nathaniel Reichek, Stuart Rabinowitz, Steven R. Sigman, Randall Patterson, Carolyn R. Corn, Richard White, Ella Kazerooni, James Corbett, Sabahat Bokhari, Josef Machac, Erminia Guarneri, Salvador Borges-Neto, John W. Millstine, James Caldwell, James Arrighi, Udo Hoffmann, Matthew Budoff, Joao Lima, James R. Johnson, Barbara Johnson, Mariya Gaber, Julie A. Williams, Courtney Foster, Jon Hainer, Marcelo F. Di Carli SPARC Investigators</p></div><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: This study examined short-term cardiac catheterization rates and medication changes after cardiac imaging. Noninvasive cardiac imaging is widely used in coronary artery disease, but its effects on subsequent patient management are unclear.</p>
<p>METHODS: We assessed the 90-day post-test rates of catheterization and medication changes in a prospective registry of 1,703 patients without a documented history of coronary artery disease and an intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, or 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Baseline medication use was relatively infrequent. At 90 days, 9.6% of patients underwent catheterization. The rates of catheterization and medication changes increased in proportion to test abnormality findings. Among patients with the most severe test result findings, 38% to 61% were not referred to catheterization, 20% to 30% were not receiving aspirin, 35% to 44% were not receiving a beta-blocker, and 20% to 25% were not receiving a lipid-lowering agent at 90 days after the index test. Risk-adjusted analyses revealed that compared with stress single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, changes in aspirin and lipid-lowering agent use was greater after computed tomography angiography, as was the 90-day catheterization referral rate in the setting of normal/nonobstructive and mildly abnormal test results.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Overall, noninvasive testing had only a modest impact on clinical management of patients referred for clinical testing. Although post-imaging use of cardiac catheterization and medical therapy increased in proportion to the degree of abnormality findings, the frequency of catheterization and medication change suggests possible undertreatment of higher risk patients. Patients were more likely to undergo cardiac catheterization after computed tomography angiography than after single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography after normal/nonobstructive and mildly abnormal study findings.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/" target="_blank"></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4195/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simultaneous Right and Left Heart Real-Time, Free-Breathing CMR Flow Quantification Identifies Constrictive Physiology</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4183</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4183#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Ghoshhajra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constrictive Pericarditis (CP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitral Valvular (MV)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-Time Phase Contrast (RT-PC) Flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tricuspid Valve (TV)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012; 5(1):15-24Thavendiranathan P, Verhaert D, Walls MC, Bender JA, Rajagopalan S, Chung Y-C, Simonetti OP, Raman SV OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a novel cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) real-time phase contrast (RT-PC) flow measurement technique to reveal the discordant respirophasic changes in mitral and tricuspid valve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012; 5(1):15-24</p><p class="authors">Thavendiranathan P, Verhaert D, Walls MC, Bender JA, Rajagopalan S, Chung Y-C, Simonetti OP, Raman SV</p></div><br/><div>
<p>OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a novel cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) real-time phase contrast (RT-PC) flow measurement technique to reveal the discordant respirophasic changes in mitral and tricuspid valve in flow indicative of the abnormal hemodynamics seen in constrictive pericarditis (CP). Definitive diagnosis of CP requires identification of constrictive hemodynamics with or without pericardial thickening. CMR to date has primarily provided morphological assessment of the pericardium.</p>
<p>METHODS: Sixteen patients (age 57 to 13 years) undergoing CMR to assess known or suspected CP and 10 controls underwent RT-PC that acquired simultaneous mitral valve and tricuspid valve inflow velocities over 10 s of unrestricted breathing. The diagnosis of CP was confirmed via clinical history, diagnostic imaging, cardiac catheterization, intraoperative findings, and histopathology.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Ten patients had CP, all with increased pericardial thickness (6.2 to 1.0 mm). RT-PC imaging demonstrated discordant respirophasic changes in atrioventricular valve inflow velocities in all CP patients, with mean SD mitral valve and tricuspid valve inflow velocity variation of 46 to 20% and 60 to 15%, respectively, compared with 16 to 8% and 24 to 11% in patients without CP (p &lt;0.004 vs. patients with CP for both) and 17 to 5% and 31 to 13% in controls (p &lt; 0.001 vs. patients with CP for both). There was no difference in atrioventricular valve inflow velocity variation between patients without CP compared with controls (p &lt; 0.3 for both). Respiratory variation exceeding 25% across the mitral valve yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 100%, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 1.0 to detect CP physiology. Using a cutoff of 45%, variation of transtricuspid valve velocity had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 88%, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.98.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Accentuated and discordant respirophasic changes in mitral valve and tricuspid valve inflow velocities characteristic of CP can be identified noninvasively with RT-PC CMR. When incorporated into existing CMR protocols for imaging pericardial morphology, RT-PC CMR provides important hemodynamic evidence with which to make a definite diagnosis of CP.</p>
</div>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22239888" target="_blank">22239888</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4183/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pulmonary Hypertension: How the Radiologist Can Help</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4146</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4146#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulmonary Hypertension (PH)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Radiographics. 2012; 32(1):9-32Elena Pena, Carole Dennie, John Veinot, and Susana Hernandez MunizPulmonary hypertension is defined as an abnormal elevation of pressure in pulmonary circulation, with a mean pulmonary arterial pressure higher than 25 mmHg, regardless of the underlying mechanism. The clinical classification system for pulmonary hypertension was updated at the fourth World Symposium on Pulmonary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Radiographics. 2012; 32(1):9-32</p><p class="authors">Elena Pena, Carole Dennie, John Veinot, and Susana Hernandez Muniz</p></div><br/><p>Pulmonary hypertension is defined as an abnormal elevation of pressure in pulmonary circulation, with a mean pulmonary arterial pressure higher than 25 mmHg, regardless of the underlying mechanism. The clinical classification system for pulmonary hypertension was updated at the fourth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension in Dana Point, California, in 2008. In patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension, the diagnostic approach includes four stages: suspicion, detection, classification, and functional evaluation. It is crucial to understand the advantages and disadvantages of the different imaging tools available for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Many conditions that cause pulmonary hypertension have suggestive findings at multidetector computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging; some causes may be surgically treatable, whereas others may demonstrate adverse reactions to vasodilator therapies used during the course of treatment. Therefore, the radiologist plays an important role in evaluating patients with this disease.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22236891" target="_blank">22236891</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4146/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Left Coronary Sinus With an Interarterial Course: Subtypes and Clinical Importance</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4090</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4090#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anomalies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Event (MACE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High/Low Interarterial Course]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left Coronary Sinus (LCS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right Coronary Artery (RCA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typical Angina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Radiology. 2012; 262(1):101-108Lee HJ, Hong YJ, Kim HY, Lee J, Hur J, Choi BW, Chang HJ, Nam JE, Choe KO, Kim YJOBJECTIVES: To classify anomalous origins of the right coronary artery (RCA) from the left coronary sinus (AORL) with an interarterial course into two subtypes and to evaluate the clinical importance of each. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Radiology. 2012; 262(1):101-108</p><p class="authors">Lee HJ, Hong YJ, Kim HY, Lee J, Hur J, Choi BW, Chang HJ, Nam JE, Choe KO, Kim YJ</p></div><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: To classify anomalous origins of the right coronary artery (RCA) from the left coronary sinus (AORL) with an interarterial course into two subtypes and to evaluate the clinical importance of each.</p>
<p>METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study, and informed consent was waived. Through a retrospective review of 22 925 consecutive cardiac computed tomographic (CT) scans, 124 cases of AORL with an interarterial course were identified. These anomalies were classified into two subtypes according to the location of the anomalous RCA ostium: high interarterial course (between the aorta and the pulmonary artery) and low interarterial course (between the aorta and the right ventricular outflow tract). The clinical records were evaluated, and differences in prevalence of typical angina and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) between the subtypes were analyzed through the χ(2) contingency tables or Fisher exact test.</p>
<p>RESULTS: After excluding patients with combined cardiac disease, 87 patients (51 [59%] men, 36 [41%] women; mean age, 56.0 years) were enrolled. Of the 87 patients, 53 had a high interarterial course and 34 had a low interarterial course. A significant difference in the prevalence of typical angina (high [43%] vs low [6%], P = .001) and MACE (high [28%] vs low [6%], P = .012) was observed between the two subtypes. For patients with a high interarterial course, the odds ratio for typical angina was 12.3 (95% confidence interval: 2.7, 56.6), and the odds ratio for MACE was 6.3 (95% confidence interval: 1.3, 29.7).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of typical angina and that of MACE were significantly higher in patients with a high interarterial course than in those with a low interarterial course.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22056684" target="_blank">22056684</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4090/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC): A Prospective Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4077</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4077#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 07:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Invasive Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Club Selections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE-MARC Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Ischaemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspected CAD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/>The Lancet. 2011; 378(9809):2089-2094John P Greenwood, Neil Maredia, John F Younger, Julia M Brown, Jane Nixon, Colin C Everett, Petra Bijsterveld, John P Ridgway, Aleksandra Radjenovic, Catherine J Dickinson, Stephen G Ball, Sven Plein OBJECTIVES: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">The Lancet. 2011; 378(9809):2089-2094</p><p class="authors">John P Greenwood, Neil Maredia, John F Younger, Julia M Brown, Jane Nixon, Colin C Everett, Petra Bijsterveld, John P Ridgway, Aleksandra Radjenovic, Catherine J Dickinson, Stephen G Ball, Sven Plein</p></div><img src="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jc-small4.png" width="19" height="13" alt="" title="Journal Club Selections" /><br/><div>
<p>OBJECTIVES: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol with x-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard, and to compare CMR with SPECT, in patients with suspected coronary heart disease.</p>
<p>METHODS: In this prospective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were scheduled for CMR, SPECT, and invasive x-ray coronary angiography. CMR consisted of rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress and rest SPECT used 99mTc tetrofosmin. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of CMR.</p>
<p>RESULTS: In the 752 recruited patients, 39% had significant CHD as identified by x-ray angiography. For multiparametric CMR the sensitivity was 86·5% (95% CI 81·8—90·1), specificity 83·4% (79·5—86·7), positive predictive value 77·2%, (72·1—81·6) and negative predictive value 90·5% (87·1—93·0). The sensitivity of SPECT was 66·5% (95% CI 60·4—72·1), specificity 82·6% (78·5—86·1), positive predictive value 71·4% (65·3—76·9), and negative predictive value 79·1% (74·8—82·8). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMR and SPECT differed significantly (p&lt;0·0001 for both) but specificity and positive predictive value did not (p=0·916 and p=0·061, respectively).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: CE-MARC is the largest, prospective, real world evaluation of CMR and has established CMR&#8217;s high diagnostic accuracy in coronary heart disease and CMR&#8217;s superiority over SPECT. It should be adopted more widely than at present for the investigation of coronary heart disease.</p>
</div>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/" target="_blank"></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4077/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CT for Evaluation of Myocardial Cell Therapy in Heart Failure A Comparison With CMR Imaging</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4059</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4059#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronen Rubinshtein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delayed Enhancement (DE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart Failure (HF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left Ventrical Ejection Fraction (LVEF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MiniPigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Regenerative Cell Therapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4(12):1284-1293Schuleri KH, Centola M, Choi SH, Evers KS, Dawoud F, George RT, Lima JA, Lardo ACOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to assess therapeutic effects of myocardial regenerative cell therapies. Cell transplantation is being widely investigated as a potential therapy in heart failure. Noninvasive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4(12):1284-1293</p><p class="authors">Schuleri KH, Centola M, Choi SH, Evers KS, Dawoud F, George RT, Lima JA, Lardo AC</p></div><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to assess therapeutic effects of myocardial regenerative cell therapies. Cell transplantation is being widely investigated as a potential therapy in heart failure. Noninvasive imaging techniques are frequently used to investigate therapeutic effects of cell therapies in the preclinical and clinical settings. Previous studies have shown that cardiac MDCT can accurately quantify myocardial scar tissue and determine left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF).</p>
<p>METHODS: Twenty-two minipigs were randomized to intramyocardial injection of phosphate-buffered saline (placebo, n = 9) or 200 million mesenchymal stem cells (MSC, n = 13) 12 weeks after myocardial infarction (MI). Cardiac magnetic resonance and MDCT acquisitions were performed before randomization (12 weeks after MI induction) and at the study endpoint 24 weeks after MI induction. None of the animals received medication to control the intrinsic heart rate during first-pass acquisitions for assessment of LV volumes and LVEF. Delayed-enhancement MDCT imaging was performed 10 min after contrast delivery. Two blinded observers analyzed MDCT acquisitions.</p>
<p>RESULTS: MDCT demonstrated that MSC therapy resulted in a reduction of infarct size from 14.3 ± 1.2% to 10.3 ± 1.5% of LV mass (p = 0.005), whereas infarct size increased in nontreated animals (from 13.8 ± 1.3% to 16.5 ± 1.5%; p = 0.02) (placebo vs. MSC; p = 0.003). Both observers had excellent agreement for infarct size (r = 0.96; p &lt; 0.001). LVEF increased from 32.6 ± 2.2% to 36.9 ± 2.7% in MSC-treated animals (p = 0.03) and decreased in placebo animals (from 33.3 ± 1.4% to 29.1 ± 1.5%; p = 0.01; at week 24: placebo vs. MSC; p = 0.02). Infarct size, end-diastolic LV volume, and LVEF assessed by MDCT compared favorably with those assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance acquisitions (r = 0.70, r = 0.82, and r = 0.902, respectively; p &lt; 0.001).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that cardiac MDCT can be used to evaluate infarct size, LV volumes, and LVEF after intramyocardial-delivered MSC therapy. These findings support the use of cardiac MDCT in preclinical and clinical studies for novel myocardial therapies.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22172785" target="_blank">22172785</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4059/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3D Echo Systematically Underestimates Right Ventricular Volumes Compared to Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients With Moderate or Severe RV Dilatation</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4046</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4046#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 05:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Ghoshhajra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-Time 3D Echocardiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right Heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right Ventricle (RV)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volumetric Increase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2011; 13(78):247-251Andrew M Crean, Neil Maredia, George Ballard, Ravi Menezes, Gill Wharton, Jan Forster, John P Greenwood and John D ThomsonOBJECTIVES: Three dimensional echo is a relatively new technique which may offer a rapid alternative for the examination of the right heart. However its role in patients with non-standard ventricular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2011; 13(78):247-251</p><p class="authors">Andrew M Crean, Neil Maredia, George Ballard, Ravi Menezes, Gill Wharton, Jan Forster, John P Greenwood and John D Thomson</p></div><br/><p>OBJECTIVES: Three dimensional echo is a relatively new technique which may offer a rapid alternative for the examination of the right heart. However its role in patients with non-standard ventricular size or anatomy is unclear. This study compared volumetric measurements of the right ventricle in 25 patients with adult congenital heart disease using both cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and three dimensional echocardiography.</p>
<p>METHODS: Patients were grouped by diagnosis into those expected to have normal or near-normal RV size (patients with repaired coarctation of the aorta) and patients expected to have moderate or worse RV enlargement (patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot or transposition of the great arteries). Right ventricular end diastolic volume, end systolic volume and ejection fraction were compared using both methods with CMR regarded as the reference standard</p>
<p>RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis of the 25 patients demonstrated that for both RV EDV and RV ESV, there was a significant and systematic under-estimation of volume by 3D echo compared to CMR. This bias led to a mean underestimation of RV EDV by -34% (95%CI: -91% to + 23%). The degree of underestimation was more marked for RV ESV with a bias of -42% (95%CI: -117% to + 32%). There was also a tendency to overestimate RV EF by 3D echo with a bias of approximately 13% (95% CI -52% to +27%).</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in volumetric measurements were observed between the two techniques. At the current time, three dimensional echocardiography is not interchangeable with CMR for volumetric assessment of ACHD patients who have more than mild RV dilatation.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/" target="_blank"></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4046/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prognostic Importance of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiomyopathy</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4035</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4035#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 01:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacobo Kirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiomyopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial Fibrosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/?p=4035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Heart. 2011; 98(1):12Ismail TF, Prasad SK, Pennell DJCardiovascular magnetic resonance has revolutionised the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy, particularly through the use of late gadolinium enhancement imaging which provides the unique opportunity to assess myocardial fibrosis in vivo. More recently, the prognostic capability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to predict outcomes has been assessed. Traditional risk markers do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">Heart. 2011; 98(1):12</p><p class="authors">Ismail TF, Prasad SK, Pennell DJ</p></div><br/><p>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance has revolutionised the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy, particularly through the use of late gadolinium enhancement imaging which provides the unique opportunity to assess myocardial fibrosis in vivo. More recently, the prognostic capability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to predict outcomes has been assessed. Traditional risk markers do not at present adequately predict outcomes in either dilated cardiomyopathy or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which are the two most common causes of primary heart muscle disease. Many of these existing markers reflect underlying disease severity. Given the important role fibrosis is thought to play in the pathogenesis and sequelae of these cardiomyopathies, the presence and amount of fibrosis has been proposed as a potential novel risk factor for adverse events. This paper reviews the evidence for late gadolinium enhancement as a prognostic marker in dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and highlights the challenges ahead.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22128204" target="_blank">22128204</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/4035/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

