
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Prepared Minds &#187; Radiography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/category/radiography/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com</link>
	<description>In the field of observation, chance favors the prepared minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Current Concepts of Integrated Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization Laboratory</title>
		<link>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/1119</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/1119#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Schoenhagen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Invasive Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CPCI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physiologically-Guided Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Angiographically-Guided Approach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/1119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 55: 173-185. 2010; 55(1):173-185Kern MJ, Samady HOver the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article_meta"><p class="journal">J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 55: 173-185. 2010; 55(1):173-185</p><p class="authors">Kern MJ, Samady H</p></div><br/><p>Over the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent large multicenter study (FAME [FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation]) found that a physiologically-guided approach was superior to the standard angiographically-guided approach for percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This review addresses selected pertinent concepts and studies supporting the integration of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory for optimal patient outcomes.</p>
<p class="pmid">PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/" target="_blank"></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepreparedminds.com/archives/1119/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
