Adaptive StatisticaEstimated Radiation Dose Reduction Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Coronary CT Angiography: The ERASIR Study

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and study quality for coronary CT angiography (CTA).

METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 574 consecutive patients undergoing coronary CTA at three centers. Comparisons were performed between consecutive groups initially using filtered back projection (FBP) (n = 331) and subsequently ASIR (n = 243) with regard to patient and scan characteristics, radiation dose, and diagnostic study quality.

RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in the use of prospective gating, tube voltage, or scan length. The examinations performed using ASIR had a lower median tube current than those obtained using FBP (median [interquartile range], 450 mA [350–600] vs 650 mA [531–750], respectively; p < 0.001). There was a 44% reduction in the median radiation dose between the FBP and ASIR cohorts (4.1 mSv [2.3–5.2] vs 2.3 mSv [1.9–3.5]; p < 0.001). After adjustment for scan settings, ASIR was associated with a 27% reduction in radiation dose compared with FBP (95% CI, 21–32%; p < 0.001). Despite the reduced current, ASIR was not associated with a difference in adjusted signal, noise, or signal-to-noise ratio (p = not significant). No differences existed between FBP and ASIR for interpretability per coronary artery (98.5% vs 99.3%, respectively; p = 0.12) or per patient (96.1% vs 97.1%, p = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS: ASIR enabled reduced tube current and lower radiation dose in comparison with FBP, with preserved signal, noise, and study interpretability, in a large multicenter cohort. ASIR represents a new technique to reduce radiation dose in coronary CTA studies. 

PMID:

Posted in Computed Tomography and tagged , , , , .

2 Comments

  1. see story on http://www.theheart.org:
    http://www.theheart.org/article/1111649.do

    Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: Assessment of Image Noise and Image Quality in Coronary CT Angiography.
    Jonathon Leipsic, Troy M. LaBounty, Brett Heilbron, James K. Min, G. B. John Mancini, Fay Y. Lin, Carolyn Taylor, Allison Dunning, James P. Earls.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):649-54.
    PMID: 20729442

    And post from March 2, 2010:

    Innovations in CT Dose Reduction Strategy: Application of the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
    Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194(1):191-199.
    PMID:

  2. See also:

    A new iterative reconstruction algorithm for 2D exterior fan-beam CT.
    Zeng L, Liu B, Liu L, Xiang C.
    J Xray Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 1;18(3):267-77.
    PMID:

    see also:

    A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography.
    Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, Roobottom C, Rowles N, Bellenger N, Morgan-Hughes G.
    Heart. 2010 Jun;96(12):922-6.
    PMID: 20538667

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *