Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Validation Study

OBJECTIVES: Absolute quantification of perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has not previously been applied in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Owing to increased contrast bolus dispersion due to the greater distance of travel through a bypass graft, this approach may result in systematic underestimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF). As resting MBF remains normal in segments supplied by non-critical coronary stenosis (<85%), measurement of perfusion in such territories may be utilized to reveal systematic error in the quantification of MBF. The objective of this study was to test whether absolute quantification of perfusion with CMR systematically underestimates MBF in segments subtended by bypass grafts.

METHODS: The study population comprised 28 patients undergoing elective CABG for treatment of multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Eligible patients had angiographic evidence of at least one myocardial segment subtended by a non-critically stenosed coronary artery (<85%). Subjects were studied at 1.5T, with evaluation of resting MBF using model-independent deconvolution. Analyses were confined to myocardial segments subtended by native coronary arteries with <85% stenosis at baseline, and MBF was compared in grafted and ungrafted segments before and after revascularization.

RESULTS: A total of 249 segments were subtended by coronary arteries with <85% stenosis at baseline. Following revascularization, there was no significant difference in MBF in ungrafted (0.82±0.19 ml/min/g) versus grafted segments (0.82±0.15 ml/min/g, p=0.57). In the latter, MBF following revascularization did not change significantly from baseline (0.86±0.20ml/min/g, p=0.82).

CONCLUSIONS: Model-independent deconvolution analysis does not systematically underestimate blood flow in graft-subtended territories, justifying the use of this methodology to evaluate myocardial perfusion in patients with CABG. 

PMID: 21343329

Posted in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and tagged , , , , .

One Comment

  1. Interesting study proving the use MBF for assessment after CABG!

    Not sure how useful clinically, but adds some light into the concept of dispersion of contrast bolus after CABG.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *